Difference between revisions of "TC 372 Workshop Compendium"
From filmstandards.org
| (20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Do we talk about the same thing? [[The case for reference models]]. | * Do we talk about the same thing? [[The case for reference models]]. | ||
Some elements of a metadata model | Some elements of a metadata model | ||
| − | * Events in the lifecycle of an audiovisual creation. | + | * [[Events in the lifecycle of an audiovisual creation]]. |
| − | * Relationships: An essential component of art and culture. | + | * [[Relationships: An essential component of art and culture]]. |
| − | * "No entity without identity". Where philosophers can help. | + | * "[[No entity without identity]]". Where philosophers can help. |
Analysing audiovisual metadata | Analysing audiovisual metadata | ||
| − | * | + | * [[Description levels: A worked example]]. |
| − | * Agent and event: Further examples. | + | * [[Agent and event: Further examples]]. |
| + | * [[Approaching the subject of a film work]] | ||
Things must have names (even though EN 15907 doesn't supply them) | Things must have names (even though EN 15907 doesn't supply them) | ||
| − | * Common pitfalls in vocabulary selection. | + | * [[Common pitfalls in vocabulary selection]]. |
| − | * Where to look for suitable | + | * [[Where to look for suitable vocabularies]]. |
| − | * Titles and proper names: Why some conventions are more useful than others. | + | * [[Titles and proper names]]: Why some conventions are more useful than others. |
| − | + | Working from secondary and from original sources | |
| − | + | * [[Example: Pancéřové Auto / Das Panzerauto]] | |
| − | + | * [[Example: Die freudlose Gasse]] | |
| − | * | + | * [[Example: The Illegals]] |
Expressing relationships | Expressing relationships | ||
| − | * Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits. | + | * [[Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits]]. |
| − | * Relating | + | * [[Relating artifacts with events]]: Is this still filmography? |
| − | * Relationships with objects in other databases: Taking the internet seriously. | + | * [[Relationships with objects in other databases]]: Taking the internet seriously. |
Usage scenarios for EN 15907 | Usage scenarios for EN 15907 | ||
| − | * In-house usage scenarios | + | * [[In-house usage scenarios]] |
| − | * Filmographic information in the ocean of data | + | * [[Filmographic information in the ocean of data]] |
Latest revision as of 18:26, 6 December 2011
Audiovisual metadata: What it is and why it matters
- Setting the scene. Metadata specifications in context.
- Yet another standard? How EN 15744 and EN 15907 came into being.
Obstacles to interoperability and approaches to overcome them
- Yet another database? How fragmentation happens.
- Do we talk about the same thing? The case for reference models.
Some elements of a metadata model
- Events in the lifecycle of an audiovisual creation.
- Relationships: An essential component of art and culture.
- "No entity without identity". Where philosophers can help.
Analysing audiovisual metadata
- Description levels: A worked example.
- Agent and event: Further examples.
- Approaching the subject of a film work
Things must have names (even though EN 15907 doesn't supply them)
- Common pitfalls in vocabulary selection.
- Where to look for suitable vocabularies.
- Titles and proper names: Why some conventions are more useful than others.
Working from secondary and from original sources
Expressing relationships
- Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits.
- Relating artifacts with events: Is this still filmography?
- Relationships with objects in other databases: Taking the internet seriously.
Usage scenarios for EN 15907