Difference between revisions of "TC 372 Workshop Compendium"
From filmstandards.org
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* [[Where to look for suitable element vocabularies]]. | * [[Where to look for suitable element vocabularies]]. | ||
* [[Titles and proper names]]: Why some conventions are more useful than others. | * [[Titles and proper names]]: Why some conventions are more useful than others. | ||
| − | + | Working from original sources | |
| − | + | * [[Example: Die freudlose Gasse]] | |
| − | + | * [[Example: The Illegals]] | |
| − | * | ||
Expressing relationships | Expressing relationships | ||
* Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits. | * Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits. | ||
Revision as of 14:47, 5 April 2011
Audiovisual metadata: What it is and why it matters
- Setting the scene. Metadata specifications in context.
- Yet another standard? How EN 15744 and EN 15907 came into being.
Obstacles to interoperability and approaches to overcome them
- Yet another database? How fragmentation happens.
- Do we talk about the same thing? The case for reference models.
Some elements of a metadata model
- Events in the lifecycle of an audiovisual creation.
- Relationships: An essential component of art and culture.
- "No entity without identity". Where philosophers can help.
Analysing audiovisual metadata
Things must have names (even though EN 15907 doesn't supply them)
- Common pitfalls in vocabulary selection.
- Where to look for suitable element vocabularies.
- Titles and proper names: Why some conventions are more useful than others.
Working from original sources
Expressing relationships
- Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits.
- Relating artefacts with events: Is this still filmography?
- Relationships with objects in other databases: Taking the internet seriously.
Usage scenarios for EN 15907
- In-house usage scenarios
- Filmographic information in the ocean of data