Difference between revisions of "TC 372 Workshop Compendium"
From filmstandards.org
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Expressing relationships | Expressing relationships | ||
* [[Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits]]. | * [[Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits]]. | ||
| − | * Relating | + | * [[Relating artifacts with events]]: Is this still filmography? |
* Relationships with objects in other databases: Taking the internet seriously. | * Relationships with objects in other databases: Taking the internet seriously. | ||
Usage scenarios for EN 15907 | Usage scenarios for EN 15907 | ||
* In-house usage scenarios | * In-house usage scenarios | ||
* Filmographic information in the ocean of data | * Filmographic information in the ocean of data | ||
Revision as of 08:13, 6 April 2011
Audiovisual metadata: What it is and why it matters
- Setting the scene. Metadata specifications in context.
- Yet another standard? How EN 15744 and EN 15907 came into being.
Obstacles to interoperability and approaches to overcome them
- Yet another database? How fragmentation happens.
- Do we talk about the same thing? The case for reference models.
Some elements of a metadata model
- Events in the lifecycle of an audiovisual creation.
- Relationships: An essential component of art and culture.
- "No entity without identity". Where philosophers can help.
Analysing audiovisual metadata
Things must have names (even though EN 15907 doesn't supply them)
- Common pitfalls in vocabulary selection.
- Where to look for suitable element vocabularies.
- Titles and proper names: Why some conventions are more useful than others.
Working from original sources
Expressing relationships
- Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits.
- Relating artifacts with events: Is this still filmography?
- Relationships with objects in other databases: Taking the internet seriously.
Usage scenarios for EN 15907
- In-house usage scenarios
- Filmographic information in the ocean of data