The case for reference models

From filmstandards.org

Revision as of 19:30, 1 April 2011 by Dbalzer (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''From the TC 372 Workshop Compendium'' ==Do we talk about the same thing?== '''Naming a data element''' may appear sufficient in order to give it a '''meaning'''. While th...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

From the TC 372 Workshop Compendium

Do we talk about the same thing?

Naming a data element may appear sufficient in order to give it a meaning. While this may be true for personal databases, it clearly isn't as soon as people from different backgrounds want to share the information.


Country-vs-country.png

Both statements on the left appear to be correct when viewed independently from each other.

Let's assume that the first statement is from a database of documentaries for educational purposes. Most users of this database will be more interested in where the film was shot, rather than in where it was produced.

The second statement is what we would expect from a general filmographic database where films are usually associated with a production country.