Difference between revisions of "Clarifying the seemingly obvious: Cast and credits"

From filmstandards.org

Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
The first thing to note is that his contribution is, like that of most actors, at the '''work level'''.
 
The first thing to note is that his contribution is, like that of most actors, at the '''work level'''.
 +
|}
 +
 +
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;"
 +
|-
 +
| valign="top" width="405px" |[[File:Ashton-xml2.png|400px]]<br />
 +
<span style="font-size:8pt">
 +
</span>
 +
 +
| valign="top" width="405px" |
 +
Here is an XML representation of the relationship.
 +
 +
For uniquely identifying the '''person''', we have included an '''identifier''' from the British film Institute. At this place, we could add any number of further identifiers.
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 21:29, 5 April 2011

From the TC 372 Workshop Compendium

Cast and credits appear to be simply relationships between films and people, and perhaps fictitious characters. Is it really that simple?

Actor-ashton.jpg

From: The Tales of Hoffmann, UK, 1951.

This is Frederick (later: Sir Frederick) Ashton acting as a character named Cochenille, taken from a German manifestation of the British production of Hoffmanns Erzählungen, made in 1951.

The first thing to note is that his contribution is, like that of most actors, at the work level.

Ashton-xml2.png

Here is an XML representation of the relationship.

For uniquely identifying the person, we have included an identifier from the British film Institute. At this place, we could add any number of further identifiers.