Relationships: An essential component of art and culture

From filmstandards.org

Revision as of 11:58, 4 April 2011 by Dbalzer (talk | contribs) (Giving spice to metadata)

Giving spice to metadata

Why do we add something to a collection of an archive, a museum, or a library? We do not add something because it weighs 3.5 kilograms, is of blue color, or is made of cardboard. We rather add it because it relates to something we know, and possibly, to other things in ways we still have to discover.

Tasse untertasse.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2006-10-15_Tasse%2BUntertasse-Pflaume01.jpg

Trash or treasure? It all depends on relationships.

Who drank from this cup? Was it someone important? Who was the previous owner? Is it a rare specimen or does it exist in thousands of exemplars? Who created the design and who manufactured it? Is it a specimen of an important artistic style?

And perhaps most importantly: was it used in the set decoration for a film?

Cidoc-crm-prop.png

From: Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, Version 4.2.5a. CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group, September 2008

A small excerpt from the list of relationships (referred to as properties in this context) from the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM). Originally motivated by the requirements of museums, this model had (and continues to have) a profound impact on metadata activities throughout the cultural heritage sector.

The CIDOC CRM is an elaborate example of what is also known as a domain ontology.