Difference between revisions of "Type and relationship vocabularies"
From filmstandards.org
(→Frequently asked: Cartoon characters, named animals, and the like) |
(→A type of Agent?) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
For some philosophical concepts of agents and actions, see [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/action/]. | For some philosophical concepts of agents and actions, see [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/action/]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In drama, a fictitious character would be considered as part of the ''subject'' of the work. | ||
===Approaches in filmography=== | ===Approaches in filmography=== | ||
Any known? | Any known? | ||
Revision as of 06:37, 19 May 2011
Contents
Frequently asked: Cartoon characters, performing animals, and the like
Examples
Asterix[1], Barbie[2], Bernd das Brot[3], Godzilla[4], Krteček[5], Mickey Mouse[6], Mister Ed[7], R2D2[8], Les Shadoks[9]
Relevance
Often asked for by cataloguers and by users of filmographic data.
A type of Agent?
First and foremost, this appears to be a question of the nature of these creations. Can they qualify as Agents because they appear to be capable of acting in certain ways?
From the EN 15907 definition of Agent:
"... an entity that is involved in the creation, realization, curation or exploitation of a Cinematographic Work"
For some philosophical concepts of agents and actions, see [10].
In drama, a fictitious character would be considered as part of the subject of the work.
Approaches in filmography
Any known?